NewsCase StudiesEvents

New Double Tax Treaty between Cyprus and UK

Also in the news...

Foreign Secretary travels to India to strengthen economic and tech ties, October 2021

Liz Truss announces technology and infrastructure tie-ups with India to boost both economies and help developing countries grow in a clean and sustainable way.

International Trade Week launched to support new exporters

Trade department support for exporters in week-long event taking place next month

Moving Abroad For Work: How To Manage Your Finances

Relocating to a new country to start a business or get an exciting new role is an exhilarating process, but you need to make sure that you’re fully prepared.

International Trade Secretary opens the Global Investment Summit

Secretary of State for International Trade, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, welcomes overseas investors and delegates to the Global Investment Summit in London.

Croatia: providing services and travelling for business

Guidance for UK businesses on rules for selling services to Croatia.

New Double Tax Treaty between Cyprus and UK

Back to News

On 22 March 2018, Cyprus and the UK have signed a Double Tax Treaty (DTT). Once in force and effective, the treaty will replace the existing DTT between the two parties of 1974. The new treaty is generally based on the OECD Model Tax Convention framework, albeit with some modifications.

Application

The treaty applies to taxes on income as well as on gains from alienation of movable or immovable property.

In the case of Cyprus the treaty covers the corporation tax, the income tax, the special contribution for the defense and the capital gains tax. For the UK it covers the corporation tax, the income tax and the capital gains tax.

 

Withholding tax rates

The new treaty is significantly more advantageous than the current one for what concerns withholding tax rates.

The treaty provides for the following withholding tax rates, under the condition that the recipient is the beneficial owner of the relevant income – the equivalent rates applicable in the existing DTT are presented in brackets:

Dividends: Nil (Current DTT: Nil/15 per cent if received by individual shareholders regardless of their percentage of shareholding and by companies controlling less than 10 per cent of the voting shares of the company paying the dividend).

An exception applies where dividends are paid out of income (including gains) derived directly or indirectly from immovable property owned by an investment vehicle, which distributes most of this income annually and whose income from such immovable property is exempted from tax. In such a case a withholding tax of 15% is applied, unless the beneficial owner of the dividends is a pension scheme established in the other contracting state in which case no withholding tax is applied.

Interest: Nil (Current DTT: 10%).

Royalties: Nil (Current DTT: Nil/5 per cent on film and TV royalties).


Gains from sale of property rich companies

Gains from the sale of shares in companies which derive the majority of their value from immovable property (property rich companies) are taxed in the country where the property is located. An exception applies for companies the shares of which are traded in a recognised stock exchange.


Limitation of Benefits

The DTT includes a Limitation of Benefits provision, which states that no benefit will be granted in respect of an item of income or a capital gain if it is reasonable to conclude, having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances, that obtaining that benefit was one of the principal purposes of any arrangement or transaction that resulted directly or indirectly in that benefit.

Determination of tax residency of companies

For companies which are tax resident in both countries the following should be considered by the tax authorities of the two states in determining where such a company will be taxed:

a) the place where the senior management is carried on;

b) the place where the meetings of the board of directors or equivalent body are held;

c) the place where the headquarters are located;

d) the extent and nature of the economic nexus to each state and;

e) whether determining that such a company is a resident of only one of the contracting states would carry the risk of an improper use of the convention or inappropriate application of the domestic law of either state.

The above list is not exhaustive, however in the absence of Point e, the remaining group of factors above will generally be considered as decisive.

Article supplied by the Fiducenter

You are not logged in!

Please login or register to ask our experts a question.

Login now or register.