NewsCase StudiesEvents

Excessive Burden Leads to a Tax Reduction in Box 3 Dutch Equity Tax

Also in the news...

Ghana: UK Science and Innovation Network summary

A summary from UK Science and Innovation Network (SIN) on science and innovation in Ghana including UK SIN priorities and successes.

How to Build a Rewarding Work Environment That Employees Love

In today’s workplace, building a rewarding environment where employees feel valued and motivated is crucial for business success. Employees who love where they work are more engaged, productive, and loyal, which leads to better overall performance for the company.

Why UK Businesses Expanding Abroad Need Conveyancing Solicitors

As UK businesses increasingly look to expand their operations overseas, the importance of having the right legal support cannot be overstated. One of the key areas where businesses face significant challenges is in navigating foreign property transactions.

Navigating Crypto Regulations: What Investors Need To Know

Cryptocurrencies have shifted from niche investments to mainstream financial assets, attracting retail and institutional investors. With this rise in popularity, the regulatory landscape has become increasingly complex, presenting new challenges for those looking to invest. Understanding these regulations is vital for navigating the crypto market confidently.

Sweden: UK Science and Innovation Network

A summary from UK Science and Innovation Network (SIN) on science and innovation in Sweden including UK SIN priorities and successes.

Excessive Burden Leads to a Tax Reduction in Box 3 Dutch Equity Tax

Back to News

An excessive burden can lead to a (time-proportional) reduction of box 3 (Dutch tax on equity). A previous ruling by the Court of Appeal has now been confirmed by the Supreme Court.

It regardeda very specific casein which a man had invested his capital in SNS Reaal shares on 31 January 2013. A day later, i.e. on February 1, 2013, the Dutch State took over the shares of the financial concern to save SNS Reaal from a probable collapse.

Per box 3 reference date 1 January 2013, this man owned approximately EUR 275,000 in the form of shares in another company. This investment he exchanged for the shares in SNS Reaal, which became worthless on 1 February 2013. Because of this unpleasant turn, the man’s income fell below the poverty line.

Despite the fact that the reference date in the box 3 system does not take account of the development of the assets during the remainder of the tax year after the reference date,the Court felt that this was still an excessive burden in the tax year 2013.

This excessive burden arose, according to the Court, with regard to the fiscal year 2013 from 1 February to the end of 2013. As a result, the Court has applied a time-proportional reduction over the box 3 capital for the period February to December, so that his capital was only taxed for a pro rata 1/12th part.

The Supreme Court has followed this ruling of the Court, but it also found that the Court went very far in applying non-existing legislation in terms of a time-proportionate application.

It is questionable whether this ruling can also apply for example when crypto coins collapse. For more recent tax years, it can in any case be advisable to object to the height of the deemed interest used in box 3. This ruling indicates that some evidence to the contrary – in addition to the stacking of deemed interest – is still permitted.

As an alternative to box 3, it is possible to only be taxed for the actual interest in box 2!For example,in case of fluctuating and / or low-yielding assets.

We can assist you with drawing up your personal income tax return,we can also assist you in a possible objection procedure.


You are not logged in!

Please login or register to ask our experts a question.

Login now or register.