Also in the news...
Ghana: UK Science and Innovation Network summary
A summary from UK Science and Innovation Network (SIN) on science and innovation in Ghana including UK SIN priorities and successes.
How to Build a Rewarding Work Environment That Employees Love
In today’s workplace, building a rewarding environment where employees feel valued and motivated is crucial for business success. Employees who love where they work are more engaged, productive, and loyal, which leads to better overall performance for the company.
Why UK Businesses Expanding Abroad Need Conveyancing Solicitors
As UK businesses increasingly look to expand their operations overseas, the importance of having the right legal support cannot be overstated. One of the key areas where businesses face significant challenges is in navigating foreign property transactions.
Navigating Crypto Regulations: What Investors Need To Know
Cryptocurrencies have shifted from niche investments to mainstream financial assets, attracting retail and institutional investors. With this rise in popularity, the regulatory landscape has become increasingly complex, presenting new challenges for those looking to invest. Understanding these regulations is vital for navigating the crypto market confidently.
Sweden: UK Science and Innovation Network
A summary from UK Science and Innovation Network (SIN) on science and innovation in Sweden including UK SIN priorities and successes.
CJEU Judgement Affects Vat Deduction Position Of Holding Companies
The CJEU recently rendered its judgment (16 July 2015) in the joined cases Larentia + Minerva and Marenave Schiffahrts concerning the VAT deduction position of holding companies. It also answered the question of whether entities without ‘legal personality” can be included as part of a VAT group.
With respect to the input VAT deduction, the CJEU in its decision drew a distinction based on whether the holding company is actively involved in the management of its subsidiaries or not. It has been confirmed that active holding companies should have the right to fully reclaim the input costs incurred in relation to the acquisition of shares in those subsidiaries. On the other hand, mixed holding companies have to determine the calculation method for the deduction of their input VAT costs as the apportionment between economic and non-economic activities will be required.
EU states have different interpretations. The CJEU is very much in line with some member states, like the Netherlands and Belgium, but in some member states (Germany and the United Kingdom, for example) the judgment may have a considerable impact on holding companies.
Businesses with holding companies based in the EU should carefully review their corporate organization and monitor closely the changes that may be adopted in the various EU Member States.
Active holding companies having been prevented by tax authorities in the EU to deduct in full their input VAT costs in the past should assess the possibility of launching proceedings to reclaim this input VAT in accordance with the conditions for such proceeding imposed by national law.
Mixed holding companies should carefully analyse the impact of this decision, especially in respect of their past entitlement to deduct input VAT. In this case, it is crucial to evaluate the possible solutions to mitigate any risks especially for the past and to determine the method for the apportionment of the input VAT deduction of the holding company for the future.
VAT legislation can be fraught with risk; it’s advisable to consult with local experts in cases of ambiguity or uncertainty